Alfred Toepfer, the founder of the Alfred Toepfer
Foundation. Toepfer’s business interests in the 1940s provided slake lime for
the mass graves in the Lodz Ghetto and was involved in the industrial
exploitation of occupied France. In the final days of the war, Heinrich Himmler
and other leading Nazis gathered at Toepfer’s estate, Kalkhorst, a Nazi Reich
leadership school. Foreign collaborators with the Nazis were trained to take
over governorships of the German Reich in the conquered Euro states. The founder
himself, Toepfer gave race lectures at Kalkhorst. After the war Toepfer
supported financially Thies Christopherson, the author of the book
The
Auschwitz Lie, which denied the extermination of the Jews. The Toepfer
Foundation has since the war demanded further compensation for their lost Nazi
land in the east. The former Nazi possessions comprise several hundred hectares
and are the subject of dispositions made by the 1945 Potsdam Agreement. The
Toepfer Foundation today has claimed the protection of the European Human Rights
Convention. The foundation is today a highly influential political movement. The
notorious foundation belongs to an influential group of German
ethno-organizations and enjoys direct contact with the German government. Former
Minister of State in the German chancellery Christina Weiss, social democrat,
worked under the auspices of the Toepfer Foundation.
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. Originally the German
Prince Tualiper Bisterford. Prince Bernhard, who was the co-founder of the
Bilderberg Group and one of the original promoters of the European Union had
also been an SS intelligence officer before the war. He had been attached to the
Nazi conglomerate I.G. Farben, which promoted Nazi interests around the world
and spied for the German state. I.G. Farben was so dangerous that it was broken
up by the Allies after the war. Although many of its successor parts like the
ASF are particularly active in promoting the European Union today.
This information about Bernhard and the company he worked for was confirmed
by evidence of Max Ilgner, the former head of I.G. Farben, at his trial in
Nuremberg. Despite continuous denials after the war that he had ever been a Nazi
Party member, Bernhard was revealed in 1995 thanks to details released from U.S.
archives and published in the Netherlands to have been a member of the Nazi
Party, from an early date, along with no fewer than 11 members of his family. A
copy of his resignation letter is in the national archives in Washington, DC.
The letter ended ‘Heil Hitler.’ Hardly a renunciation of Nazism.
According to many, including British academic Dr. Richard Aldrich, Prince
Bernhard’s Bilderberg Group was far more important than the European movement in
creating the European Union.
George McGhee, later ambassador to Germany, and who in fact
had been my father’s tutor at Oxford in the 1930s confirmed that the Treaty of
Rome which brought the European Community into being was nurtured at Bilderberg
meetings. There was an interesting British press cover-up in 2002 when
The
Daily Telegraph printed an obituary of Prince Claus of the Netherlands on
the 8th of October. Mention was made of his father-in-law, Prince Bernhard,
having steered clear of the Nazis in the 1930s. I wrote an obituary letter
pointing out Prince Bernhard’s longstanding membership in the Nazi Party, his
role as an SS intelligence officer attached to I.G. Farben etc etc. The editor
referred me to the letters editor but she refused to publish the letter. After
detailed correspondence with Charles Moore of
The Daily Telegraph, the
paper still refused to publish the facts, i.e. to correct their complete
falsehood about Prince Bernhard.
The Times,
The Daily Mail and
The Evening Standard refused to cover the story.
Kurt Georg Kiesinger. Kiesinger was an early member of the
Nazi Party, and as early as 1934 became a member of the Sturmabteilung [SA —
storm troopers]. In April 1940 he joined the German Foreign Office and became
the head of the department responsible for the Nazis’ radio propaganda, not a
function left to anyone other than a convinced Nazi. He was responsible for
propaganda in the occupied territories, promoting the German military and
political forces in France, Belgium and Greece, where he broadcast via the Nazi
Radio Patrice, encouraging chaos, murder and sabotage by the population against
the Greek state.
Despite his consistent representation of the Nazi totalitarian state, after
the war in 1945, and with the support of two Nazi colleagues in the German
Foreign Office, he was able to take up his career again. The German Foreign
Office was notorious under Adenauer as having hundreds of ‘former’ Nazis long
after the war.
In 1966 Kurt Georg Kiesinger, as leader of the German Christian Democrat
Party, became chancellor of Germany.
Theodor Heuss. Heuss was a former designer of concentration
camps and supplier of slave labor to the B2 project, as Tom Bowie in his book
“Blind Eye to Murder,” testifies.
Heuss voted for Hitler’s infamous Enabling Act in 1933, which gave the Nazis
the power to override both houses of Parliament, the source of Hitler’s absolute
power. Heuss became federal president of Germany in 1949. He was therefore
intimately involved in the creation of the European Union.
The Federal Union of European Ethnic Groups [FUEV]. The FUEV is an
anti-Semitic, Nazi-supported, German-dominated promoter of ethnic regional
politics. And that very regional principle now being embraced in Britain by the
Labor government.
Both the Welsh nationalists and the Cornish separatists are associated with
the FUEV. One ethnic group is excluded. As an early statement of the FUEV’s
principles established, Jews are excluded from ethnic rights enjoyed by other
nations. Today that organization is active throughout Europe and in particular
among German minorities in Germany’s neighboring countries: Czech Republic,
Belgium, Denmark, Poland, etc. The FUEV pursues the goal of a Federal Europe of
the Regions, which means in their own words the end of the unitary and
centralized nation-state, but not of course the end of the centralized European
superstate.
Since the 1950s when Hans Joseph Graf Matuschka of the European Union of
Germany, as it then was, succeeded in linking the FUEV to the German Foreign
Office, the organization has had the financial support of the German government.
It is involved in the European Union’s Committee of the Regions and the European
Council’s Congress of Communities of Regions and since 1995 it is represented in
the UN itself.
It is no mitigation of the above to say that most of those individuals are
long gone, for the institutions they helped to found are not only active today,
but the constitutional structures they created now govern most of Europe. They
do so indeed by virtue of European treaties which refer consistently in truly
fascist style to their “irrevocable and irreversible” provisions.
The Charlemagne Prize. The prize was originally founded by
the Nazis, but was then re-founded in 1949 by the efforts of the Aachen textile
merchant Kurt Pfeiffer. Pfeiffer, who had previously been a member of the Nazi
Party and of five other Nazi organizations, maintained that he had always tended
to be a fundamental believer in Europe. And the Charlemagne Prize Society was to
be associated with the imperial idea Reichsidee of the Emperor Charlemagne. The
post-war image of Charlemagne as unifier of the Christian west was preceded by
his Nazi portrayal as a unifier of the German tribes. Charlemagne had been
compared with Hitler, his Reich and Greater Germany. This is clearly exemplified
by the career of the Aachen professor of philosophy Peter Mennicken, who took
over the professorship previously occupied by an expelled Jew, and who after the
war had authorized influence over the symbolism of the Charlemagne Prize and the
liturgy of its award ceremonies.
Mennicken had joined the SA, the storm troopers, in 1933 and the Nazi Party
in 1937. He used his lectureship at Technical High School of Aachen in the
service of expansion as ‘western research,’ and worked for two so-called
“societies for international understanding,” which were informal offshoots of
the Nazi Propaganda Ministry used for German propaganda in the Netherlands and
Belgium.
It is therefore not surprising, considering those who were involved in the
foundation of the European Union, that its top prize the Charlemagne Prize
should have had such well authenticated Nazi roots.
But now let us consider some post-war European British and American figures
who were influential in establishing the now powerful European Union and its
rule over 27 nation-states of Europe.
George Kennan. Kennan, who died in 2005, was possibly the
leading post-war U.S. foreign affairs expert and an authority on Russia.
Left-wing super-nationalist with excessive sympathy for authoritarian regimes in
Germany, Spain and Italy, and a critical influence on U.S. foreign policy of the
1950s. Kennan was a regular attendee at the Bilderberg Group, which nurtured the
creation of the European Union. Kennan found Nazi Germany so palatable that he
studied in Heidelberg in the 1930s, and stayed even until the early 1940s when
he was interned at Bad Nauheim. There he even lectured, obviously with the
approval of the Nazis. German magazine
Der Spiegel reported on the 5th
of December 1951 that lecturing there he had claimed that Germany’s defeat would
extinguish the 2000-year-old history of European civilization. He attacked the
Allies for not enforcing a greater circumspection on the Nazi regime and caused
it to proceed more slowly with the actualization of its timetable. After the
war, Kennan was particularly influential in stopping the de-Nazification program
initiated in 1945. A recent biographer chronicles Kennan’s baffling appreciation
of Europe’s dictatorships — Mussolini’s in Italy, Dollfuss’s in Austria, and
Salazer’s in Portugal. Kennan believed that their kind of authoritarian
government was a healthy and welcome alternative to inefficient parliamentary
democracy.
Kennan [suggested] in the 1950s that the U.S. change its longstanding
hostility to Franco’s fascist regime in Spain in order to secure U.S. influence
in the Mediterranean. Kennan thought the First World War had not been worth
fighting. He said in an interview with the
New York Review of Books in
1999: I would like to see our government gradually withdraw from its public
advocacy of democracy and human rights.
Giuliano Amato was a former prime minister of Italy and
became vice chairman of the European Union’s Constitutional Convention, which
drew up the the European constitution, which of course was thoroughly rejected
by the French and the Dutch referenda, but has been reintroduced in the
so-called Lisbon Treaty.
In the Italian newspaper
La Stampa of 13th of July 2000, Amato
wrote, “Sovereignty lost on a national level does not pass to any new
individual. It is entrusted to a faceless entity, and those in command can
neither be identified nor elected. As a matter of fact, the metamorphosis is
already here. All we need are a few corrections here and there along with a
great deal of cunning. Their place will be taken by a multitude of authorities,
each of which will be at the head of different interests.” This of course is a
classic element of fascism. And he continues: “Different interests that possess
ambiguous levels of power, by moving the power we are used to, will disappear.”
In other words, the democratic power we are used to will disappear. Indeed, as
we all know, it has disappeared.
Amato continued in his
La Stampa article: “In Europe one needs to
act as if. As if what was wanted was little, in order to obtain much. As if
states were to remain sovereign, you can convince them to concede sovereignty.
The commission in Brussels, for example, should act AS IF it were a technical
instrument in order to be able to be treated as a government, and so on by
disguise and subterfuge.” What a very good summary that is of the fascist
process behind the substance of the European Union.
Now let’s look at
Kenneth Clarke, the former Conservative
Home Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer. It was Kenneth Clarke who as a
young student in the Cambridge University Conservative Association invited
Oswald Mosley, the leader of the British Union of Fascists to speak. And the
young Michael Howard, who became leader of the Conservative Party, resigned from
the association in protest. Many political and corporate beliefs unite a
Euro-fanatic anti-democrat like Kenneth Clarke and the former leader of the
British Union of fascists Oswald Mosley, so perhaps the invitation was not
surprising. Mosley had said, “At a moment of supreme crisis the will to [unite]
a nation can arise everywhere from the soil of Europe like a primeval fire.
First must come the idea.” There is little difference between that which Oswald
Mosley as an individual and the 1962 fascist National Party of Europe set out.
An idea which Kenneth Clarke, a so-called conservative of today, believes and
which European treaties since 1957 have achieved. That explains why Clarke voted
recently to prevent the British people having a vote on the Lisbon
constitutional treaty. Although I note that he was chairman of the Conservative
Party’s Democracy Task Force. To say that the European Union’s combination of
modern corporatism and historic fascism may sound extraordinary, but I have laid
out substantial evidence for this in my two books
Europe’s Full Circle
and
Fascist Europe Rising, and I will provide more evidence in my
forthcoming book
Into the Fire. So finally you might like to guess
which of these quotations of European leaders stem from the fascist 1930s and
40s and which from the heyday of the European Union’s construction in the 1980s
and 90s:
“Might is right in politics and war.”
“Genocide is a natural phenomenon; it is recommended, even commanded
by the Almighty.”
“Many Jews survive today thanks to the circumstance that they were
forced laborers. Germans are tired of philo-Semitic overcompensation in the
media and sterile grief rituals by politicians.”
“The Jews should consider whether they would have behaved heroically
if they had not been victims of persecution.”
“Germany should now, as it has become peaceful and reasonable, get
all that Europe and the whole world has refused in two gigantic wars, a sort of
smooth hegemony over Europe.”
Well in fact ALL the above quotes are from European leaders of the 1980s and
1990s. They were, in the following order: Helmut Kohl, Chancellor of Germany;
Franjo Tudjman, president of Croatia; Lutz Niethammer, adviser to German
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder; Klaus Von Dohnanya, former mayor of Hamburg; and
finally Joschka Fischer, former German Foreign Secretary. No wonder, as
Newsweek noted on the 6th of June 1997, that German troops who marched
into [Croatia] after the breakup of Yugoslavia, were greeted with cries of “Sieg
Heil!” And no wonder the Kosovo Albanians said as NATO troops marched in that
they were pleased to see the fascist armies. And they meant it in complimentary
fashion.
We live in very dangerous times. But let us be in no doubt what has happened
to the United Kingdom as it surrendered to the rule of those who have for
centuries sought our destruction. Nothing has happened which our Parliament and
our governments did not freely do to themselves, albeit behind the backs of the
true sovereigns, the voters. And if our MPs and government wish to survive,
there is no power on earth which can stop them restoring the sovereignty of a
free British people. But so long as they refuse to do so, they are and will be
seen to be guilty of the enslavement of Britain by those very imperialist and
fascist European powers which 50 million deaths and two world wars apparently
failed to defeat.
**********
Epilogue:
An additional
excerpt from the German former neo-Nazi Ingo Hasselbach’s book
Fuehrer-Ex, with an introduction by Atkinson:
We quote here from a book “Fuehrer-Ex” written by Ingo Hasselbach, a former
German Neo Nazi who was intimately involved in the co-operation between French
and German Nazis in their aid of Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War and between
German Nazis and Croatian Fascists as Croatia fought to break up Yugoslavia
throughout the 1990s. In the latter endeavour they had the indirect support of
the German Army and the German Government (who of course were President
Tudjman’s principal backers).
This kind of co-operation proves even more conclusively what this website has
already exposed — that “German Europe” has broken up both Czechoslovakia and
Yugoslavia into precisely the same petty nationalist and religiously extreme
statelets which 1940s Nazism and Fascism created in those countries. That
process has had the same results — murder, ethnic cleansing and the persecution
of Serbs, gypsies and Jews. And the putting on trial, not of the supporters of
Fascism and Nazism but their opponents, as we witnessed in the trial of
Milosevic in The Hague “Court”.
As regards modern Nazi involvement in the Gulf War there are long standing
German links with Ottoman Islam (Turkey was a German ally in the First World War
and Germany set up an officers’ training school in Baghdad. Hitler received the
Grand Mufti in Berlin as an anti-Semitic ally). Baathism which underlay Saddam’s
dictatorship in Iraq and Assad’s in Syria was created by a French educated Iraqi
who admired both Hitler and Stalin!
Needless to say these are the kind of people who naturally gravitated to
supporting Croatia, Bosnia and Albanian Kosovo, just as their predecessors did
in Germany, Austria and the Vatican in the 1940s — and against whom the Serbs
and their much maligned leader Milosevic struggled from 1990 to the present day.
That the values of Nazi and Fascist Europe of the 1940s are well represented in
the EU of today is made even clearer in the Balkans. Indeed throughout Europe we
see resistance to the Euro-State hegemony from precisely the same countries who
resisted Nazism in the past - Yugoslavs, Czechs, Norwegians, Danes, British,
Poles and Swiss. On the other hand we see the most avid supporters of the modern
“European Project” as the most convinced Nazis of the past - Germany, Austria,
Belgium, Croatia, Bosnia, Slovakia - or Fascism - Spain and Italy. Let us see
how a modern day Nazi (now reformed!) saw these recent developments:
…
As international preparations for the war progressed that fall, many
neo-Nazis saw it as their great chance to get involved in a fight against
Israel. Michael Kuhnen and Michel Faci, the French Fascist, founded an
“Anti-Zionist Legion” of German neo-Nazis to fight in the Gulf on the Iraqi
side. Faci was well known for getting himself involved in all kinds of
conflicts. In the early 1980s he had “seen action” in South America when he was
hired as a mercenary. For Faci, war was like a kind of pornography — an endless
snuff film in which he got to play soldier with real weapons and real
bodies.
Faci went to Baghdad at Saddam Hussein’s invitation to set things up. They
signed a contract to provide German volunteers for Saddam Hussein to support
Iraq against “the present aggression of Zionist and U.S. imperialist forces,”
specifying that every neo-Nazi officer was to be guaranteed 5,000 deutsche
marks, every legionnaire 3,000. But while the Gulf War was a bit of a
disappointment — its speed and scale made it inappropriate for much mercenary
involvement — on its heels came a war that provided far better opportunities for
neo-Nazi intervention.
GERMAN NAZIS JOIN CROAT FASCIST ATTACK ON SERBS
IN THE SPRING of 1991, the civil war in Croatia began. The Movement saw it as
the perfect chance to give those who wanted it real experience killing people.
Moreover, there was a historical tie: during World War II Nazi Germany had
played an active role in Yugoslav ethnic politics; the Nazis had supported a
puppet dictatorship in Croatia, the Ustashe, that had built concentration camps
in which mostly Serbs but also Jews [and gypsies] were killed.
…
A
system was set up whereby potential recruits for Croatia were first trained in
paramilitary camps in Germany, then passed on to middlemen who were responsible
for arranging their transport, clothing, and food on the way to the
front.
The way it worked was first through a word-of-mouth network. We had to be
careful about doing any advertising because hiring mercenaries was strictly
illegal in the Federal Republic. It was simply known in the scene that you could
go to Croatia, if fighting was your trip, and that in Berlin I was one of the
contacts. The other main contact people in Berlin were Arnulf Priem and Oliver
Schweigert. Once we’d checked out recruits to make sure they weren’t spies, we
took them to a paramilitary camp to get tested and trained. We were mainly
interested in whether they were physically fit to go down there. Mental fitness
didn’t interest us much.
I knew one guy from the GDR [German Democratic Republic — East Germany] who’d
been loosely involved in the Movement for about a year and then went down to
Croatia…In a documentary some television team made at the front, he was
interviewed and he talked about how many Serbs he’d killed and how much he’d
learned about weapons. Less than a year later, he was killed himself.
But the more sane and careful ones came back after a few months or a year
with valuable training in weapons and explosives. They’d of course also learned
what it was like to kill people. Many stayed down there, living in the hills,
constantly involved in skirmishes no one ever heard about, and are only now
coming back into Germany and Austria and forming the basis of the most militant
and dangerous neo-Nazi cells.
The effort to organize young German neo-Nazis and send them to
Croatia to fight and kill for the Ustashe — as the SS had once done — was
organized largely by the Movement representatives in Hesse, Bavaria, and, for
logistical reasons, as it was directly on the border with Yugoslavia — Austria.
The main man in charge in Germany was Nero Reisz. He organized transport and
took care that everyone got uniforms and weapons. Then Michel Faci and his
right-hand man, Nikolas, organized most of the Croatian neo-Nazi units, training
both young Croatians and Germans who’d come down for the ride.
Faci trained Croatians as young as ten years old (NOTE that
both Muslim and Croat armies did this — which explains why “men and boys” died
around Srebrenica in the normal course of battle, not necessarily as the result
of a “massacre” out of which the fascist powers made and continue to make so
much anti-Serb propaganda - Atkinson) to kill “Communists” while teaching them
the basics of Nazism. With his childish antics, he is good at making murder seem
like a game.
The neo-Nazis mostly fought independently from other units, as a legionnaire
corps. But they received arms and ammunition, even tanks, from the Croatians
(who were in turn funded by the German State - Atkinson)…(in one form or another
the Bosnian Muslim, Croatian fascist and Kosovo Albanians recreated the systems,
and often the names, of the Nazi Waffen SS divisions which fought the Serbs… -
Atkinson) They kept track of how many Serbs they killed and tried to collect per
body pay from the Croatians, but they actually got hardly anything, apart from
invaluable experience.
I NEVER WENT down there. Personally, I wouldn’t have gone to Croatia for
anything in the world. I saw no reason to risk my neck for another nation. I was
only interested in the potential of getting battle-hardened recruits back from
the front. The actual fight in Yugoslavia didn’t interest me.
So I organized paramilitary camps and helped provide training and tested the
recruits with the help of a few sympathetic people from the Bundeswehr. There
was a lot of physical training-jogging, crawling, scaling. Recruits learned how
to use firearms and how to dismantle, clean, and reassemble them. There was
explosives training and practice in throwing grenades and using bazookas.
We modelled our course on Bundeswehr training exercises and what we
could piece together about the old Waffen SS training with the help of training
manuals and the memories of our retired SS supporters.
But the basic source for our training was the West German Federal
Army…
FUHRER-EX, Memoirs of a Former Neo-Nazi by Ingo Hasselbach (with
Tom Reiss) , Chatto and
Windus, London, 1996.
**********
At
this ordering site one can see short summaries of Atkinson’s
other books — including
Government Against the People and
Treason
at Maastricht — along with comments by prominent international
personalities. “Rodney Atkinson is a former adviser to Ministers and an
internationally praised author of 6 books on political economy and the crisis
caused by the European Superstate, including “
Europe’s Full Circle” and “
Fascist Europe Rising” …He founded the international cross
party website
Freenations and
The British Declaration of Independence. He has broadcast on
radio and television in the UK, Germany, Poland, Yugoslavia, Australia and the
USA and his books have sold in more than 50 countries.”
Closing with a partial quote by Czech Republic’s globalist first president,
Vaclav Havel:
The war on Yugoslavia is “an important precedent for the future…[S]tate
sovereignty must inevitably dissolve” and nation-states will be transformed into
“civil administrative units.”
– Vaclav Havel, in a speech to Canadian Parliament (quoted via “
The Truth Leaks Out About Kosovo,” by Phyllis Schlafly, Nov.
24, 1999)
