Showing posts with label OBAMA'S LIES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OBAMA'S LIES. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Coptic Christians Rally for Human Rights in DC, by Faith J. H. McDonnell


Coptic Christians Rally for Human Rights in DC, by Faith J. H. McDonnell

Monday, July 25, 2011

45 signs of Communism in the USA and soon to come

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Durban III Boycotts Put Brakes on Anti-Israel Campaign

Durban III Boycotts Put Brakes on Anti-Israel Campaign



The Czech Republic and the Netherlands have joined a growing boycott of Durban III, putting the brakes on the worldwide anti-Israel campaign
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Published: 25/07/11, 8:30 AM


Anti-Israel Durban poster and UN
Anti-Israel Durban poster and UN
Israel news photo montage
The Czech Republic and the Netherlands have joined a growing boycott of the United Nations session of Durban III on September 22, putting the brakes on the worldwide anti-Israel campaign.
Durban III takes place on the 10th anniversary of the Durban, South Africa Declaration and Program of Action to Fight Racism, and focuses on Israel while ignoring genocide and racism in Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Syria and dozens of other countries, most of them Muslim.
"Unacceptable statements with anti-Jewish connotations” emanating from the program for Durban III were the reasons for pulling out of the conference, the Czech Foreign Ministry said. "The Czech Republic will not attend the September top-level meeting and will not participate in any informal talks designed to pass a political declaration that is to ensue from them," it added.
Israel, the United States, Canada and Italy already have announced they will not attend the conference.
The Netherlands, like Italy and the Czech Republic, objected to the Durban III planners’ refusal to include in a final statement that "all participating states emphatically distance themselves from the linking of subjects that have nothing to do with the fight against racism.”
“The three countries now see themselves forced to no longer participate in the preparations for the celebration, and also not to attend it, " the Dutch Foreign Affairs Ministry said.
"A number of countries have in the past continually put the peace process in the Middle East in the center of the discussions on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, along with which denying Israel's right to exist," the ministry added.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini announced on Friday that Italy has decided to boycott the Durban III Conference to be held in September due its anti-Israeli nature and noted that Italy chose not to attend the second Durban Conference in 2009 for the same reasons.
Prague cited concerns that the conference would be used as a platform to make "unacceptable statements with anti-Jewish connotations

White House bolstering rise of Chinese dragon? Pass this on!

White House bolstering rise of Chinese dragon?


Minimizing Beijing's military threat, denying its expansionist intentions



Posted: July 23, 2011
10:55 pm Eastern
By Aaron Klein

President Obama's China adviser, Evan Medeiros, has a long history of downplaying the threat to U.S. interests posed by Beijing's rapid military and economic growth, once even penning a paper that argued China should embrace a "great power mentality."
Medeiros was appointed as China director of the White House National Security Council in 2009.
He was a foreign policy adviser to Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and even donated $3,800 to the candidate, his only campaign contribution on record since 2000.
Read about the growing conflict, in "AMERICA FOR SALE: Fighting the...
Medeiros has been an external researcher at the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, where he has given several recent lectures.
He was formerly a senior research analyst at the Arms Control Association in Washington, D.C. He was also a project associate with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and joined the RAND Corporation as a political scientist in 2002.
Prior to that, Medeiros was a senior research associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute

Tiananmen Square, Beijing
In his most recent "Inside the Ring" column in the Washington Times, Bill Gertz cited congressional Republicans as identifying Medeiros as a key player involved in the Obama administration's policy of refusing to sell needed arms to Taiwan.
The same report blamed Medeiros for delaying the release of a second Pentagon report to Congress on the shifting air power balance in the Taiwan Strait.
The Times also cited Republican staff aides and a defense official as stating they believe Medeiros is behind efforts to block the release to Congress of the Pentagon's annual report on Chinese military power, completed months ago and due to Capitol Hill on March 1.
The report on China's military was also delayed last year. When it was eventually released, the report was watered down with a minimized title. Previously called the "Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China," the report was renamed "Annual Report on Security Developments Involving China."
Medeiros, meanwhile, was fingered by Gertz's sources as a key official in preventing the U.S. sale of 66 advanced F-16 jets to Taiwan and for delaying the sale of equipment to upgrade Taiwan's existing F-16s. Both military moves were expected to anger China.
A review of Medeiros's articles and statements to the news media finds a regular trend of minimizing China's threat to the U.S.
In 2009, just before his appointment to the NSC, Medeiros stated China was not seeking to "confront the United States or expel it from the region."
He argued China was not aiming to replace America as a superpower.
In 2007, Medeiros, speaking as an expert at the RAND Corporation, argued Beijing's military buildup is limited to Asia and it has not sought to project power globally.
"Cumulatively, this is a substantial amount of money devoted toward military modernization. And it's clearly a reflection of the Chinese government's priorities and the fact that they seek to build a modern military with regional power projection capabilities," Medeiros said.
In 2005, Medeiros said of China's People's Liberation Army: "Do the old shibboleths still apply – that the Chinese defense industry is backward, poor and low-quality?"
"No," he continued. "It seems China has turned the corner. … For the first time in 20 years, the PLA has adopted reforms that make sense. They adopted, and implemented, and are really learning quickly."
Medeiros that year was lead author of a 300-page RAND study, "New Directions for China's Defense Industry."
In 2002, he minimized China's missile project, telling The Economist that the Chinese "don't really see missiles as weapons of mass destruction while most American policymakers equate the two."
In an article in the November-December 2003 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, Medeiros, with analyst M. Taylor Fravel, presented the views of experts on Chinese foreign policy as stating China should overcome its long-held ''victim mentality'' and adopt a ''great power mentality'' instead.
Speaking to Knight Ridder in 2001, Medeiros stated, "The Chinese defense industrial base is very outdated and dilapidated, especially in these areas where warfare is headed.
"They don't have the high technology to compete at all," he said.
He stated China's ships and planes, at least those not acquired from Russia, are outfitted with technology equal to what American forces had in the late 1960s or early 1970s.
"So if they ever got in a battle with the United States, we could destroy their forces before they ever saw us," Medeiros added.
Still, Medeiros has incorporated criticism of China into his work. His 2005 RAND study, for example, said China "needs to do more to enforce its own controls."
Stated the study: "China has erected a structure that has a strong legal basis to control exports of goods that can be used for making weapons of mass destruction, but it hasn't devoted the necessary financial or political resources to make these controls effective.
"This is a persistent and glaring weakness," the study said.
With research by Brenda J. Elliott


Read more: White House bolstering rise of Chinese dragon? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=324577#ixzz1T1bvZ0Jr

Friday, July 22, 2011

Murdering baby girls

They would sooner kill these baby girls than give them up for adoption. Are the Islamic adoption laws that the child must be raised Muslim adhered to in other Muslim countries (like Morocco) enforced in Pakistan as well?
And even that is not halal. There is no adoption in Islam. Muhammad wanted to marry his beautiful daughter-in-law. His adopted son divorced her, but people still talked -- saying Muhammad was overcome by lust. So he got a revelation: adoption was illegitimate. The adopted son (Zaid) was never his son at all, and should stop calling himself Zaid bin Muhammad -- he went back to being Zaid bin Haritha, the name of his birth father.
Islam infanticde

PAKISTAN: More than 1200 newborn baby girls killed and dumped in the garbage last year (hat tip Bare Naked Islam)
Karachi, Pakistan (CNN) -- At a morgue in Pakistan's largest city, five linen pouches -- each the size of a loaf of bread -- line the shelf of a walk-in freezer.
Wrapped inside each small sack is the corpse of an infant.
The babies are victims of what one relief agency calls Pakistan's worst unfolding tragedy: the killing and dumping of newborns.
"Sometimes they hang them, and sometimes they kill by the knife, and sometimes we find bodies which have been burned," said Anwar Kazmi, a manager at Edhi Foundation, Pakistan's largest privately run social service and relief agency.
Records at Edhi Foundation show that more than 1,200 newborns were killed and dumped in Pakistan last year, an increase of about 200 from the previous year.
Families view many of these children as illegitimate in a [Islamic] culture that condemns those born outside of marriage.
Statistics show that roughly nine out of 10 are baby girls, which families may consider too costly to keep in a country where women frequently are not allowed to work.
The babies are usually just days old. Their corpses are often dumped in Karachi's sprawling garbage dumps, where they're sometimes mutilated by street animals, Kazmi said. He estimates that hundreds of baby corpses are never found.
[..] The killing of newborns gets little attention in Pakistan, and rarely are they investigated by a police force that's often poorly trained, lacks resources and stays focused on what's perceived to be more important crimes.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Lies Lies Lies


OIC Secretary General holds bilateral meeting with US Secretary of State on Resolution 16/18

Date: 16/07/2011 -


The OIC Secretary General Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a one-on-one, bilateral meeting on July 15, 2011 at the IRCICA Headquarters before the commencement of the Ministerial Meeting on UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18.

During the bilateral meeting, the two sides had a free and frank exchange of views on a variety of international issues. Mrs. Clinton expressed the firm commitment of the US government to further strengthen cooperation with OIC in addressing the issue of intolerance, discrimination and violence based on religion or belief and for the implementation of UN HRC 16/18.




Iraq: Young Christian beheaded and mutilated in Northern Iraq

Syrian Catholic Archbishop Boutros Moshe of Mosul. @ACN

Syrian Catholic Archbishop Boutros Moshe of Mosul. @ACN
By ACN Germany
Adapted by Amanda Bridget Griffin, ACN Canada
Wednesday, May 18, 2011 � The murder of another Christian in the city of Kirkuk, Northern Iraq, has left the country�s faithful shaken.� Twenty-nine year old Ashur Yacob Issa was kidnapped late Friday or early Saturday morning and a ransom of approximately $100 000 was demanded of his parents.� The young Catholic�s body was discovered beheaded and mutilated Monday morning (May 16), after his poor family was unable to meet the kidnappers demand for money.
The Archbishop of Kirkuk, Msgr. Louis Sako denounced the murder and has appealed �to those who were capable of committing such an inhuman act...� that they think of the children they have left orphaned and the woman now a widow. If there is no human justice, sooner or later, there will be divine justice. (ZENIT.org)
Violence against Christians in Iraq is high on the agenda, according to reports by the Catholic Church it has been on the rise since 2003. Since, approximately 2,000 Christians have been killed, dozens of attacks executed and six murders of priests committed, along with the death of one archbishop.

A crime against Humanity

In an interview with Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), the Chaldean Catholic Archbishop Sako (photo at right) marvelled at the strength and faith of his community despite the threat of such terrible violence. �In all these years, I have never heard of a single Christian converting to Islam, despite the many threats.�� On the other hand, he explained, Muslims regularly go to his church for the Sacrament of Baptism. But, �I am not allowed.� This is no religious freedom!�
Chaldean Catholic Archbishop Bashar Warda of Erbil also spoke out saying that the murder was meant to be an intimidation tactic toward Christians so that in the future they will be more apt to pay ransoms on demand.� Archbishop Warda suspected Islamists fundamentalists behind the recent act of violence and called on Muslim clerics to make clear to their faithful, that such murders are crimes against Humanity, and against Faith.
Syrian Catholic Archbishop Boutros Moshe of Mosul (photo at left), told ACN that he did not believe that the direct motive behind the violence in the country was a religious one, rather it was due to the involvement of criminal gangs and driven by the thirst for money.� Archbishop Moshe did say however, that it may be as a result of radical political movements willing to exploit criminals, and that �some even say the criminals are paid by the parties.�

ACN evaluates the situation on the ground

A delegation from ACN is currently in Iraq evaluating the situation of the Church.� Speaking with Iraqi Christians, they have found that most Iraqi Christians question the benefit of interreligious dialogue with Muslims. One priest added his opinion saying he did not know what they were to make of it [interreligious dialogue] as �the Muslims speak to us constantly about a �peaceful coexistence�, but then when something happens, violence does not seem to be condemned by Muslim clerics.�� Another priest added that they [some Muslim clerics] will come when invited to preach, but will not listen in return.
Northern Iraqi Christians living in a community settlement close to the terrorist�s stronghold in Mosul, protect themselves from the terrorists (and criminals) with concrete walls, checkpoints and armed guards.� �Armed gangs are a major problem in Mosul and its surrounding area,� said the settlement�s mayor. �We suspect that there are political parties in Iraq who pay these criminals who are hunting down Christians.�� The mayor echoed words by Archbishop Warda saying that in some Iraqi Mosques, intolerance against Christians is still being preached.
Posted on 19/05/2011

It is against Jewish Law to get a tattoo

It is against Jewish Law to tattoo

The prohibition of tattooing is found in the Torah: "You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves: I am the Lord" (Leviticus 19:28).
It is the second part of this verse from which we derive the general prohibition against tattooing. From the outset there is disagreement about what precisely makes tattooing a prohibited act. The anonymous author of a mishnah [an individual statement in the compilation known as the Mishnah] states that it is the lasting and permanent nature of tattooing which makes it a culpable act: "If a man wrote [on his skin] pricked-in writing, he is not culpable unless he writes it and pricks it in with ink or eye-paint or anything that leaves a lasting mark" (Mishnah Makkot 3:6).tattoo
But Rabbi Simeon ben Judah disagrees and says that it is the inclusion of God's name which makes it a culpable act: "Rabbi Simeon ben Judah says in the name of Rabbi Simeon: He is not culpable unless he writes there the name [of a god], for it is written, 'Or incise any marks on yourselves: I am the Lord'" (ibid.).
The Gemarah [i.e., the Babylonian Talmud (BT)] goes on to debate whether it is the inclusion of God's name or a pagan deity that makes it a culpable act.
Maimonides clearly sees the origin of this prohibition as an act of idolatry. He includes it in his section concerning idolatry and then explicitly states: "This was a custom among the pagans who marked themselves for idolatry…." But, [Maimonides] concludes that regardless of intent, the act of tattooing is prohibited (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Idolatry 12:11).

Biblical Israelites May Have Had Tattoos

Professor Aaron Demsky of Bar-Ilan University, in an article in the Encyclopaedia Judaica ("Writing"), goes even further to suggest that non-idolatrous tattooing may have been permitted in biblical times. He cites the following biblical references: "One shall say, 'I am the Lord's,' and another shall use the name of Jacob, and another shall mark his arm 'of the Lord' and adopt the name of Israel" (Isaiah 44:5), "See, I have engraved You on the palms of my hands…" (Isaiah 49:16), and " ...is a sign on every man's hand that all men may know His doings" (Job 37:7).
While these verses may be purely metaphoric, Demsky suggests they could be taken literally as instances of tattooing that were acceptable in biblical times. He goes on to add that A. Cowley (in his 1923 book Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century B.C.) showed that in Elephantine [a city in Hellenistic Egypt], slaves of Jews were marked with the names of their owners as was the general practice.

Prohibition and its Rationale

Regardless of the exact limits of this prohibition, over time the rabbis clearly extended the prohibition to include all tattooing (Tosafot commentary to BT Gittin 20b).

In our day, the prohibition against all forms of tattooing regardless of their intent, should be maintained. In addition to the fact that Judaism has a long history of distaste for tattoos, tattooing becomes even more distasteful in a contemporary secular society that is constantly challenging the Jewish concept that we are created b'tzelem Elokim (in the image of God) and that our bodies are to be viewed as a precious gift on loan from God, to be entrusted into our care and [are] not our personal property to do with as we choose. Voluntary tattooing even if not done for idolatrous purposes expresses a negation of this fundamental Jewish perspective.
As tattoos become more popular in contemporary society, there is a need to reinforce the prohibition against tattooing in our communities and counterbalance it with education regarding the traditional concept that we are created b'tzelem Elokim. But, however distasteful we may find the practice there is no basis for restricting burial to Jews who violate this prohibition or even limiting their participation in synagogue ritual. The fact that someone may have violated the laws of kashrut at some point in his or her life or violated the laws of Shabbat would not merit such sanctions; the prohibition against tattooing is certainly no worse. It is only because of the permanent nature of the tattoo that the transgression is still visible.

Removing Tattoos

New laser technology has raised the possibility of removing what was once irremovable. To date, this procedure is painful, long, and very expensive. However, it will probably not be long before the process is refined to the point where it will not be painful, overly involved, or very expensive. At such a time it might be appropriate for the [Conservative movement's] law committee to consider whether removal of tattoos should become a requirement of teshuvah [repentance, or reversion to behavior according to Jewish norms], conversion, or burial.

Only Voluntary, Permanent Tattooing is Forbidden

The prohibition of tattooing throughout the halakhic literature deals only with personal, voluntary tattooing. With respect to the reprehensible practice of the Nazis who marked the arms of Jews with tattooed numbers and letters during the Shoah [Holocaust], the Shulhan Arukh [the authoritative 16th-century code of Jewish law] makes it clear that those who bear these tattoos are blameless: "If it [the tattoo] was done in the flesh of another, the one to whom it was done is blameless" (Shulhan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 180:2).
Tattoos which are used in cancer treatment or any similar medical procedure to permanently mark the body for necessary life saving treatment are also not included in the prohibition against tattooing (Shulhan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 180:3).
The prohibition against tattoos applies only to permanent marks to the skin. Therefore hand stamps or other popular children's decorations which mimic tattoos and paint the skin in a non-permanent manner cannot be included under the prohibition of tattooing. However, l'shem hinukh (for the purpose of education), it might be appropriate for parents to make the distinction clear to their children. These also present an excellent opportunity to introduce young children to the concept that we are created b'tzelem Elokim and the implications of that concept.

Conclusion

Tattooing is an explicit prohibition from the Torah. However, those who violate this prohibition may be buried in a Jewish cemetery and participate fully in all synagogue ritual. While no sanctions are imposed, the practice should continue to be discouraged as a violation of the Torah. At all times a Jew should remember that we are created b'tzelem Elokim. We are called upon to incorporate this understanding into all our decisions.
This responsum (a formal response by a rabbi to a question about proper Jewish practice) by a contemporary Conservative rabbi reviews relevant precedents and arrives at a conclusion very much like those reached by Reform and Orthodox authorities as well. One additional point raised by others is that tattoos are often desired by young people whose parents object, making it a possible violation of the precept to honor one's parents. The practical question to which Rabbi Lucas is responding has three parts: Is tattooing permitted? Would having a tattoo prevent a person from taking part in synagogue rituals? Would it preclude burial in a Jewish cemetery?
Rabbi Alan Lucas Alan B. Lucas is Rabbi of Temple Beth Shalom in Roslyn Heights, New York.

So what is the next story now the ignorant Muslim Brotherhood decides to make up about Jews.

Muslim Brotherhood website: Israeli spies are in Tahrir Square protests, and you can tell them by their Star of David tattoos!

One little problem: observant Jews don't frequent tattoo parlors. But hey, the "spies" might be all crafty like that. For those who buy into them, the handy thing about the conspiracy theories that are so rampant in the Muslim world is that they don't have to make sense, because even evidence against the conspiracy becomes evidence for it. "Brotherhood's website alleges Israelis infiltrating Tahrir protests," by Heba Hesham for Al Masry Al Youm, July 14 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):
The Muslim Brotherhood’s official news outlet, Ikhwan Online, is reporting that “the remnants of the dissolved National Democratic Party, the state security apparatus and their Zionist allies” are trying to destabilize Egypt by infiltrating an ongoing sit-in protest in Cairo’s Tahrir Square.
The website reported on 11 July that at the 8 July protest, protesters in Tahrir Square caught three “thugs” carrying knives and foreign currencies. According to the website, the three men had a tattoo of the Star of David, a Jewish symbol, which also appears on the Israeli flag. Tattoos are forbidden under Jewish law.
"The remnants of the dissolved National Democratic Party, the State Security apparatus and their Zionist allies still attempt to use thugs and spies to suppress the revolt of the Egyptian people that have damaged the interests of the beneficiaries of the ousted regime in Egypt, and tipped the balance in the Middle East,” the Brotherhood outlet said.
While the Brotherhood lent its official support to the 8 July protest that started the sit-in, they decided not to participate in continuing protests.
According to Ikhwan Online, bombs and tear gas marked with the Star of David were also allegedly found in possession of a satellite television reporter who was inciting protesters against the police and encouraging demonstrators to storm the Ministry of Interior.
The website’s investigation of these incidents raised questions about the supposed coincidences.
Major General Hamdy Bakhit, a military expert, told Ikhwan Online that it is not unlikely there will be cooperation between the remnants of Mubarak's regime and Egypt’s enemies abroad after revolutionaries raised questions about Egypt’s controversial natural gas export deal with Israel.
"The Western countries, including the United States and Israel, want to derail the revolution because Arab revolutions limit Western influence in the region, thwart attempts to control the Middle East and deplete its resources," Ikhwan Online quoted Major General Mohammed Abdul Lateef Tolba, a security expert, as saying.
Tolba told the website that Tahrir Square, where demonstrations are entering their sixth day, is full of spies from different nationalities, led by the Zionists, the first enemy of the Arabs and Egyptians.
In mid-June, Egyptian security forces arrested Ilan Grapel, an Israeli-American law student, on charges of spying for Israel. Reports in state and independent media alike accused Grapel of sowing discord between the people and Egypt’s military rulers and raised questions about his attendance at protests in Tahrir Square.
Tolba told the Muslim Brotherhood’s website that Zionists are responsible for the current high level of street crime in Egypt. They are spreading panic among Egyptians to make them feel that the revolution did not bring them security and safety, he said, according to Ikhwan Online.
The security expert added that sit-ins are hotbeds for espionage.
But Ikhwan Online’s story also raised some cynicism about the accusations. Major General Adel Suleiman, another military expert, said, "The Zionist intelligence apparatus is not so stupid to send some thugs or spies to Tahrir with the Star of David tattooed on their bodies."
Don't like this conspiracy? There are others to choose from:
However, Suleiman also told Ikhwan Online, remnants of Mubarak’s regime, the dissolved State Security and those pushing Western agendas are manipulating the protest, even if foreign intelligence is not active there....

4 teenage girls nabbed for allegedly sending mock book bomb

The Jakarta Post Logo

Archipelago


4 teenage girls nabbed for allegedly sending mock book bomb

The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | Sat, 07/16/2011 9:13 PM
Four girls were arrested and questioned at the Bima Police precinct on Saturday for having allegedly sent a mock book bomb to the house of a police officer in Kampung Melayu, Asakota, Bima, West Nusa Tenggara.
The girls, who wore veils covering their faces, were spotted by the wife of low-ranking police officer Brig. Mulyadin while placing a thick book in front of the house. Mulyadin’s wife called the police, who later arrested the girls.
The situation in the regency has been on high alert following a homemade bomb that exploded at an Islamic boarding school on Tuesday.
Days of tense conflict followed between police and armed civilians guarding the school. Police have arrested at least 14 people allegedly implicated in the explosion.
“We are still questioning [the girls]. We haven’t yet established their motives,” Bima Police chief Adj. Sr. Comr. Kumbul KS said, as quoted by kompas.com.
The police bomb squad neutralized the suspect book by blowing it up.
Police investigators also raided the house where the suspects had reportedly been staying to search for evidence. The house is apparently close to Mulyadin’s residence.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Hamas-Tied CAIR Seeks to Impose the Sharia in America: Propaganda War Rages

After the yelling, the screaming and the storming out, Nancy Pelosi

After the yelling, the screaming and the storming out, Nancy Pelosi, the Wicked Witch of the West (no pun intended), speaks on behalf of her Satan comparing him to the story of Job! Jews read the story of Job every year during Yom Kippur And I know it quite well. Let's see who the main players are. We have Job, whose represents the We the people, We have God (I dont think any one can compare to God), and we have Satan (Obama) who made a bet with God .
God took everything away from We the People to see the loyaly they had. Only We the People found family values during a time of need with a closness to God and Satan Lost!
If storming out is patience he must have joy in beating his wife and mentally abusing his daughters in the typical Muslim fashion. And as a Muslim, he wants to change history in his favor to make it His-story and not the truth.





Pelosi: Obama Has More Patience Than Biblical Job

Pelosi also said she is “almost too busy” to continue listening to what’s going on in the debt limit negotiations.
Thursday, July 14, 2011

(CNSNews.com) – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that President Barack Obama has shown a “level of patience” in debt limit negotiations with congressional leaders that does not compare to the biblical figure Job, known as the “Man of Patience.”
“I want to commend the president – I have never seen – Job is no place compared to this president in terms of patience,” said Pelosi at a press briefing on Thursday. “He [Job] doesn’t even begin because this president has demonstrated a level of patience, not only during the meetings but as respect, respectful of the suggestions that are made by all parties at the meeting, in his preparation for the meeting, and his coming back to address concerns that are expressed by others.”
Nancy Pelosi
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and President Barack Obama. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Pelosi also said she is “almost too busy” to continue listening to what is going on in the debt limit meetings.
“Day in and day out, the president has respectfully listened, accommodated, engaged in conversation in a very informed way and he is the president of the United States,” she said. “I know he’s busy. I myself am almost too busy to continue listening to some of the things that are going on in that room. So I know he must be very busy. But he has treated everyone there with great dignity. The only thing I hope he doesn’t ask us to do is go to Camp David. That goes beyond the pale. Driving down the street for these meetings is one thing --”
Pelosi went on to describe Camp David as a place where the president should be able to study rather than hold meetings like the current debt limit negotiations.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Does Obama have a Pacifier and a Baba????Or is his diaper wet???

Does Obama have a Pacifier and a Baba????Or is his diaper wet???
Obama has proven he isn't a leader. He is not able to control his temper and his latest example was yesterday, July 13, 2011, as he stormed out of a meeting with US Senators and Congressman who are trying to come with a workable solution to fix the debt. However, Obama, who wants it his or no way  at all, yelled and screamed stompt his feet like a child having a temper tantrum and stormed out. Obama, 50 years old, still throwing his toys out of the playpen. 

This display of childlike behavior is dangerous because he can't control his temper he could have a total meltdown in front of a foreign government official and cause nuclear war where it could not matter who wins because we would all be dead as Obama heads for the underground tunnels that are designed to save the government who would be the government of the dead people of the USA.

Is this the type of President you want, a loose cannon? A lethal weapon? He can't make compromises. He can't make up his mind but his comment on if you don't do it my way I am going tell mommy who are the American People.  

However he reminds me of a character from the book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, where Veruca Salt the spoiled little rich girl who demand "I want and do my way or I'll scream" because she wanted a squirrel who was picking bad nuts and throwing them away, only she ends up being a bad nut and tossed down to the garbage.

When Obama can;t get his way he acts like a child having a temper-tantrum only he's not 3 years old but supposed to be an adult of 50 years old who has been proven to We the People of the many mental disorders described by the DSM and ICD. He cannot control his temper. Maybe he does need a vacation, a permanent vacation in a nice padded room with a nice straight jacket and the men in white to feed him. Then Michelle can call all the attendants "Whitey". But then again we all know Michelle is a Racist who hates Whites,

Obama is a dangerous man-child who is just as immature as the Late Micheal Jackson if not more. Remove him from office on the 25th Amendment and relieve him of the pressures of this job before he has a total melt down in front a head of another country. 


Written by Raven Clabough
Thursday, 14 July 2011 12:18

According to House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi, “Nobody can out debate” President Obama in the debt ceiling debate. Why then has President Obama reportedly scolded congressional leaders during a debt meeting and then stormed out, contending, “Enough is enough?”
The meeting began to become contentious when House Majority Leader Eric Cantor told President Obama that “Congress should instead consider a series of debt ceiling votes based on spending cuts that already have been identified. Talks could then continue to identify additional cuts for subsequent voters.”
Cantor told reporters at the meeting, “I suggested we were so far apart I didn’t see in the time before us how we get to where he wants us to be.”
The President’s reaction was a bit defensive. The Blaze reports: Obama, in his typical affable and diplomatic manner, warned Cantor not to set such an ultimatum and threatened to veto legislation that would extend the debt ceiling only for a short period.
“The president told me, ‘Eric, don’t call my bluff. I’m going to take this to the American people,’ ” Cantor said.
President Obama went on to criticize both sides.
“This process is confirming what the American people think is the worst about Washington: that everyone is more interested in posturing, political position and protecting their base than solving real problems,” Obama said.
The Blaze notes the irony of the President’s assertions, however:
Of course, this is coming from the man who warned Tuesday that failure to raise the debt ceiling could mean that Social Security checks, veterans benefits and other government obligations would not be paid as scheduled in August. If anyone knows anything about posturing, surely it is Obama.
After the verbal tongue-lashing issued by the President, a top Republican accused the White House of playing political games to provoke a “yes” vote on extending the ceiling. President Obama then allegedly stormed out of the meeting.
According to Cantor, “He became very agitated. He said ‘Ronald Reagan wouldn’t sit here. You either have to compromise on the dollar figure or the grand bargain.’ ” Cantor said Obama then shoved back and said, “We’ll see you tomorrow.”
Democrats have tried to deny that the President actually “walked out” of the meeting. One official explained, “Left abruptly is perfectly fair. But the meeting was over — in no sense did he walk out on it.”
One Democratic aide said, ““Obama was concluding the meeting, giving the closing remarks and talking about meeting tomorrow. Cantor interrupted him and raised for the third time doing a short-term (so after it had already been addressed twice), and Obama shut him down. Cantor was playing the role he’s played throughout this whole thing — being not productive.”
But according to another congressional aide, Obama “dressed down” Eric Cantor.
“The President spoke for several minutes uninterrupted about how he would not be deterred in doing what is best for the country,” the aide said. “The meeting ended with Cantor being dressed down while sitting in silence.”
Still others defended the President’s reaction. “[Obama] was most insistent that he wanted the debt limit extended into 2013, because he believes a repeat of what we’re going through now, when things will be politically more tense, would be very destabilizing,” claimed another aide.
According to other aides present at the meeting, who wished to remain anonymous, the meeting was the most heated that they’ve experienced during the past few months of discussions on the debt ceiling.
Cantor made a similar assertion, saying it was “the most intense meeting of the week.”
Some sources claim the president walked out on the meeting simply because Republicans have refused Democrats’ calls for taxes.
The Los Angeles Times explains:
Republicans have refused to vote for the debt ceiling increase unless it is accompanied by steep spending cuts equaling about $2.4 trillion over the next decade, though their own spending plan requires that the limit be raised. Obama is seeking a larger deficit reduction plan, totaling about $4 trillion over the decade, but would include both spending cuts and tax revenue. The GOP has rejected that idea.
Congress and the White House have been engaged in a stalemate for over a month on whether the debt $14.3 trillion debt ceiling should be raised. The administration claims that without raising the debt ceiling by the time it reaches its limit on August 2, the government will be unable to pay all of its bills.
Meanwhile, Moody’s Investors Services warned that the United States credit rating is about to be downgraded again, which could potentially impact financial markets.
Photo: President Barack Obama meets with Congressional leaders regarding the debt ceiling, July 13, 2011, in the Cabinet Room at the White House. From left are, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va., House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, and Obama: AP Images

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

What happened to Michelle Obama's law license? First lady's legal career on 'court ordered inactive status'


What happened to Michelle Obama's law license?

First lady's legal career on 'court ordered inactive status'


Posted: August 04, 2009
10:27 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling


Why did Michelle Obama give up her license to practice law in 1993?
Records at the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois list her status as "voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law."
It further states that Michelle license is "on court ordered inactive status."
The statement has many bloggers wondering why a court would issue an order to stop Michelle Obama from practicing law, and some have even suggested the first lady may have been facing allegations of misconduct.


Michelle Obama'sIllinois registration status listed as "court ordered inactive"


Michelle Obama, known as Michelle Robinson at the time, attended Princeton University and earned her juris doctor degree from Harvard Law School in 1988. She took the bar exam in Illinois, passing it on her second try and receiving her license from the state of Illinois.


Michelle Robinson as a Harvard student before she becomes Michelle Obama (photo: Harvard University)


In 1988, Michelle became an associate at Sidley & Austin, a corporate law firm in her home town of Chicago. She was assigned to mentor summer associate and future husband, Barack Obama.
She remained at the law firm for three years, leaving the lucrative practice and corporate law behind in 1991 upon her father's death. According to the Washington Post, Sidley & Austin offered Barack Obama a job upon his graduation from Harvard, but the future president declined – even though he planned on returning to Chicago. He explained that he wanted to go into politics and that Michelle would be leaving the firm to go with him.
According to the New York Times, Michelle was unfulfilled by her law career. She told the newspaper, "I wanted to have a career motivated by passion and not just money."
She elaborated in an interview with Newsweek: "I didn't see a whole lot of people who were just thrilled to be there," she said. "I met people who thought this was a good life. But were people waking up just bounding out of bed to get to work? No."


Rev. Wright marries Barack and Michelle Obama in 1992


In 1991, Michelle wrote to Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. Jarrett offered her a job as an assistant to the mayor, a position that offered $60,000 a year. When Jarrett was promoted to head the Department of Planning and Development, Michelle became an "economic development coordinator," responsible for "developing strategies and negotiating business agreements to promote and stimulate economic growth within the City of Chicago."
Michelle and Obama married in 1992 at Trinity United Church of Christ, in a ceremony officiated by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
In 1993, Michelle left the mayor's office and became executive director for the Chicago office of Public Allies, a taxpayer-funded organization that encourages young activists and places them in positions for nonprofit groups and government agencies. Barack Obama was a member of the group's founding advisory board.
Public Allies promises to help adults, ages 18 to 30, find "community leadership" positions and attend weekly training workshops and retreats. Recruits receive a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health and child care and an additional award of $4,725 to pay for student loans or college tuition.
According to Investor's Business Daily, the program promotes "diversity and inclusion" and boasts that more than 70 percent of its recruits are "people of color."
"When they're not protesting, they're staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing criminals out of jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food stamps and other welfare," Investor's Business Daily states.
One member of the 2005 Los Angeles class told IBD, "It was too touchy-feely. It's a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias."
According to the report, one of those -isms is "heterosexism." The Chicago-based Public Allies training seminar describes it as a negative result of "capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege."
The IBD report calls it "a boot camp for radicals who hate the military."
Michelle Obama worked at Public Allies from spring 1993 until fall 1996 and served on its national board of directors from 1997 until 2001. She said, "The happiest time of my life was working to build Public Allies."
On the campaign trail with her husband last year, Michelle touted her choice to give up a lucrative legal career for community service.
"We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we're asking young people to do," she said. "Don't go into corporate America. You know, become teachers. Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we're encouraging our young people to do that."


Michelle Obama campaigns for her husband


In 1993, the same year she began working for Public Allies, she applied to change her Illinois registration status for practicing law – only four years after she received her license. It is now listed as "inactive."
James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, or ARDC, has been with the commission for 30 years. He told WND that on July 1, 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order allowing Michelle to be transferred to inactive status pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court rule 770.
The ARDC website explains, "Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer's preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law."
Grogan explained, "At the time, the only way to go on inactive status was to do what she did – which was to file a petition in the Illinois Supreme Court."
He said attorneys often filed a petition for 770 when they wanted to pursue other careers, retire or begin raising a family.
"At the time, this happened all the time," he said. "Our office would have to file what's known as a consent."
Grogan said his office would have immediately alerted the court in a public filing if there had been reason to believe she should face disciplinary action.
"We filed a consent in Michelle Obama's case in which we had no objection to her transferring to inactive status," he said. "In the event that she did go on inactive status and she engaged in any disbarrable offenses, there would be a disciplinary case of public record."
He continued, "Just because someone goes on inactive it doesn't deprive us of the jurisdiction to prosecute."
Inundated by numerous 770 filings that each required a separate court ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court later simplified the inactivation process. In 2005, after Barack Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate, he changed his status to inactive as well.
"By 2005, which is several years later than his wife, the rule had changed such that you no longer had to file a petition that was such a pain for the court," Grogan explained. "Instead, the court had changed it to two types of status: inactive or retired. Either situation involves merely sending a letter to us basically saying, 'I want to transfer to inactive status.'"
Active lawyers are required to pay $289 each year and take 30 hours of Continuing Legal Education, or CLE, every two years. Under inactive status, attorneys are not required to take the courses, but they must pay $105 each year. "Inactive" registrants are not authorized to practice law. Lawyers who retire do not have to pay fees or take courses.
"A lot of people who aren't practicing say, 'Why bother?'" Grogan said.
Barack Obama remained listed as inactive until he retired this year.


Barack Obama listed as "retired"


"If you are currently inactive and want to get back in, all you have to do is send us a letter and pay the current balance of your registration," Grogan said. "However, if you're retired and want to come back in, you have to pay the full registration fee for the years you were out. I don't think Obama's going to come back to Chicago to practice, you know what I mean?"
In the case of Michelle Obama, Grogan said she would need to obtain another court order to reactivate her status because her file still falls under old rules that required her to go through the court for all status changes. He called her 1993 petition "unremarkable," saying there is no reason to believe her standing was in question.
"There's absolutely no indication of any disciplinary proceeding ever lodged against Michelle Obama," he said.
In June 1996, she was named associate dean of student services at the University of Chicago. In 2002, she began working for the University of Chicago Hospitals, eventually earning $317,000 a year after her husband became a senator. She scaled back her responsibilities to support Barack Obama's presidential campaign
The White House declined to respond to questions about the status of her license. Michelle Obama has not revealed exactly what prompted her to change her status to inactive or whether she plans to ever practice law again.


Read more: What happened to Michelle Obama's law license? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105998#ixzz1RxnSurQY